One of the things about using the phrase "global climate change" when attempting to sway the hearts and minds of your average middle class Aussie is as a general rule they massively underestimate the complexity of "climate" and I find to a level are comforted by the word "change".
For me, someone that is a little {:-)} uncomfortable with the idea of change at the best of times, this phrase actually does ring alarm bells. Why then do I think using it is a problem? In reality if I had to count the amount of times I was patted on the head and had "A change is as good as a holiday", or something in a similar vein, chanted at me during my lifetime I would probably despair of anyone taking the word seriously. I will say I haven't had it chanted at me in this context but socialisation says that a lifetime of believing change though not exactly a good thing, well, happens and usually has some type of silver lining means we just might be sending a rather unintended message.
Another thing I really don't like about using the word change is the perceived powerlessness of it. Really how often is "change" someone's specific life choice. For most of us it is something that happens to all of us and we have to deal with it. That there I feel is a key point, it has to happen before we do anything about it. Using a not particularly attention catching reactive word just prompts people to "wait and see", you never know the effects might not be that bad and we will have expended all that effort for nothing.
Maybe I am wrong but although it is a whole lot more confronting, possibly because it is a whole lot more confronting I personally prefer "climate chaos". I do think it is a lot more descriptive of the situation the science is presenting.... it really isn't just a simple equation where you add +3C to your local minimum and maximum temperatures and I find although that understanding is starting to evolve within the wider community that has been the generally held "folk wisdom" up until recently.
There is actually part of me that hesitates to use this phrase though. It is quite a confronting idea and I do believe trying to scare people into action is more often than not counter productive. In that vein I find myself stuck between a rock and a hard place when it comes to talking about this issue.. do I use the words that I believe communicate more clearly the flow on effects or do I use the more generally accepted, politically correct version that part of me believes perpetuates the problems we are currently seeing in relation to community participation on this issue.
Do you think I am totally insane and just splitting hairs to amuse myself?
What do you use and what type of reception do you get?
